Tag Archives: Jerry Sloan

Hawks (1) vs Nets (8) Preview : Mutual Understanding

Atlanta Hawks (60-22) vs. Brooklyn Nets (38-44)

untitled

A few years back a lot of us were wondering “why in the hell did Atlanta trade away Joe Johnson?” A couple of seasons later we see why. Joe Johnson isn’t/wasn’t that guy we thought he was. He wasn’t a franchise caliber guy and he couldn’t lead a team. JJ benefited from being around players who could already play. Not guys that needed him to make them better. After a few early playoff exits the Hawks grew tired of him and decided it was time to move on. Smart move.

After the trade Atlanta has improved from year to year (top three East team last season before the Horford injury,) while the Nets remained stagnant. DeRon Williams & Joe Johnson haven’t produced like their pay implicates and I think we know why… Both players just aren’t that good. Williams is a system guy (Jerry Sloan in Utah) and JJ is best served as a 2nd or 3rd option (see a few of the early Nash led Sun teams). The Nets don’t have a sense of direction and are stuck in no man’s land.

These two teams met four times with the Hawks winning 4-0. The Nets went 11-5 to close the season sort of ending it on a role. But even with that I just don’t think they’re a true playoff team.

Starters:

PG: J.Teague vs. D.Williams

SG: K.Korver vs. M.Brown

SF: D.Carroll vs. J.Johnson

PF: P.Millsap vs. M.Plumlee

C: A.Horford vs. B.Lopez

This series really isn’t all that appealing. Pacers vs. Hawks would’ve been far more interesting but it is what it is.

The Nets have the talent to make things tough but the question is will they? Brook Lopez is a top 5 scoring center, Joe Johnson is too big of a wing player for the Hawks to guard and D-Will is a veteran point guard who’s played in a Conference Finals before.

Atlanta are the Spurs of the East. They can play inside-out, outside-in, rebound, defend and everything else. Their only downfall might be how they don’t have a guy who takeover late in the game. You can get by with that in the season but in the postseason having a go to guy is critical.

Keys:

Atlanta

They’re the best team in the East but i don’t think the gap is too far. In this specific series Atlanta should be able to exploit Brooklyn’s defense with their impeccable passing. On the defensive end if they can contain Brook Lopez and keep Williams from distributing they’ll be fine. Brooklyn isn’t that good.

Brooklyn

The Nets. If Brook Lopez can establish himself downlow and the bench is performing the Nets can make it a series. Williams is going to have hell with Teague all series long but if he gets him the post he’ll have an advantage. Joe Johnson also needs to have that F*** you type of series great players usually tend to have against a foe…. oops

Prediction Hawks beat the Nets 4-1. Atlanta is just too good for BKN. The real test will be in round two for Atlanta.

Advertisements

Top 10 NBA Coaches of All-Time

Coaching is what leads players to greatness. Without Pat Riley there is no Showtime Lakers, without Red Auerbach the Celtic franchise isn’t what it is today, and without Phil Jackson there is no Michael Jordan. But which one rises above the rest? Which one orchestrated the greatest teams in history? Which coach helped guide greatness? Let’s find out.

IMG_0270.JPG

10. Red Holzman

Career:696 wins 604 losses Win%.535
Accolades:1969-70 Coach of the Year. 2x NBA Champion(’70,’73)

Holzman is without a doubt the greatest coach New York has ever seen. He won coach of the year honors and a championship in 1970 and another championship in ’73. Those Knick teams beat out the Los Angeles Lakers both times who were stacked with talent including Wilt Chamberlain, Elgin Baylor, Gail Goodrich, and Jerry West. Overcoming the odds in ’70 when Willis Reed made a heroic comeback in game 7 of the finals to win the championship.

IMG_0271.JPG

9. Jerry Sloan

Career: 1221 wins 803 losses Win%.603

The pick & roll is the simplest play in basketball. Sloan perfected that play and used it for 22 years. He took a team to back to back Finals appearances in the 90s with Karl Malone and John Stockton. Sadly, they ran up against Jordan, nullifying Sloan’s best chance at ever having a ring. Later on the Jazz picked up Boozer and drafted Deron Williams to become a good team that had potential, but they kept running into the Lakers who went on to win championships. Despite that Sloan was able to hold a job in one place and do that for 22 years never really having bad years.

IMG_0272.JPG

8. Jack Ramsay

Career:864 wins 783 losses Win%.525
Accolades:NBA Champion (’77)

Ramsay lead the Blazers with Bill Walton to a championship overcoming many odds. He was a GM for the Sixers for Wilt’s first championship. He later got the chance to coach and things just went from there. His teams’ offenses were always near the top and he made bad teams contenders. His impact on the league extended past that season though as he became a mentor to all players. Many were felt by his passing last year coaches and players throughout the league.

IMG_0273.JPG

7. Chuck Daly

Career:638 wins 437 losses Win%.593
Accolades:2x NBA Champion (’89,’90)

Daly lead the “Bad Boy” Pistons to back to back championships. The team was about mentally taking down their opponents and physically draining them. He also was the coach of the ’92 Olympic team also, referred to as the “Dream Team”, and managed what was the greatest assembled talent basketball has ever seen.

IMG_0281.JPG

6. John Kundla

Career:423 wins 302 losses Win%.583
Accolades:5x NBA Champion (’49-’50,’52-’54)

He was the coach of the Minneapolis Lakers and helped to create the first true dynasty. Kundla alongside the first true big man George Mikan won 5 championships in a 6 year stretch. Even though he had six Hall of Famers on those teams, you cannot deny his impact on the game. Everything about the post game started on his team and became the formula for success for the next 50 years.

IMG_0274.JPG

5. Larry Brown

Career:1327 wins 1011 losses Win%.568
Accolades:Coach of the Year(’01) NBA Champion (’04)

If Larry Brown could have had like 4 or 5 championships I would have named him the greatest coach of all-time. The reason behind that is because he was the best at making the most of nothing. In the 2000-01 season he took a team that had Iverson and nobody all the way to the Finals and stole a game from the Los Angeles Lakers. He took the Detroit Pistons, who’s best player was Chauncey Billups (hardly a superstar talent), to a championship beating those same Los Angeles Lakers. Larry Brown was a perfectionist and strived for nothing less. He even took the Bobcats to their first Playoff appearance. Larry Brown will go down as one of the greatest basketball minds and teachers the sport has ever seen. He is the only coach to ever win a championship in both college and the pros. I wish he would stop trying to do something at SMU and step back up to the big leagues, but with his intolerance to owners, GMs and players getting money, that will more than likely not happen.

IMG_0275.JPG

4. Pat Riley

Career:1210 wins 694 losses Win%.636
Accolades: 3x Coach of the Year (’90,’93,’97) 5x NBA Champion (’82,’85,’87,’88,’06)

Pat Riley guided the Lakers to become what we know they were in the 80s. He lead the team to 4 championships. He did not stop there though. He later lead the New York Knicks to be arguably the 2nd best team of the the entire 90s decade. Just seemed like a roadblock was always in their way. If it wasn’t Jordan and the Bulls it was Hakeem and the Rockets. Despite that they were a tough outing for any team and their series’ against the Bulls are still recalled today. Riley later (in 2006) led Dwayne Wade and Shaq to a championship beating the Dallas Mavericks in 6. Nowadays Pat Riley is trying to build a team from the front office in Miami to make up for the loss of LeBron James.

IMG_0276.JPG

3. Greg Poppovich

Career:969 wins 445 losses Win%.685
Accolades:3x Coach of the Year (’03,’12,’14) 5x NBA Champion (’99,’03,’05,’07,’14)

Pop alongside Duncan created what we know of the Spurs today. Every fan wishes their team was like the Spurs. Players come in and do their job without any off-court drama. Pop had a losing season his first year in, but never looked back after that. After his first season he proceeded to have 16 seasons with over 50 wins and the only season he did not get 50 wins was in a lockout year where only 50 games were played. He led the Spurs to 5 championships and 6 finals appearances. Those are the only championships and appearances the Spurs organization has ever had. It’s crazy to think that Pop was very heavily criticized when he was the GM for the Spurs and fired Bob Hill and appointed himself as the head coach. I don’t think anybody is looking back on that decision as a bad one anymore.

IMG_0277.JPG

2. Red Auerbach

Career:938 wins 479 losses Win%.662
Accolades:Coach of the Year(’65) 9x NBA Champion (’57,’59-’66)

His 9 rings and complete domination of the 60s led the Celtics to become the most historical franchise in the NBA. He did everything in the organization. He got Bill Russell, he got Bob Cousy, Heinson he got all of them. The man knew talent, and he knew how to use it. He had a record of 8 straight years with championships and was regarded as the greatest coach of All-Time undoubtedly without any competition for 30 years.

IMG_0278.JPG

1. Phil Jackson

Career:1115 wins 485 losses Win%.704
Accolades:Coach of the Year(’96) 11x NBA Champion (’91-’93,’96-’98,’00-’02,’09-’10)

As much as I want to disputes this it’s very hard arguing with a guy who has 11 championship under his belt. I would love to see what Phil could do as a coach when he does not have a top 3 player in the league. Despite that he helped get Jordan and the Bulls over the hump and they became arguably the greatest dynasty in basketball ever. He also made Shaq and Kobe the most unstoppable duo of the early 2000s, and helped get Kobe the rings he needed to solidify his career without Shaq.

George Karl, Lionel Hollins and Brian Shaw. Next stop?

Let the coaching carousel begin! Scott Skiles was the first the coach to leave/lose his job followed by Doug Collins, Vinny Del Negro, Byron Scott, Larry Drew, Lionel Hollins and now George Karl. Great coaches like Phil Jackson and Jerry Sloan are constantly getting mentioned as well as the Van Gundy brothers. Each coach deserves a job for next season, but each coach must pay attention to each roster and their coaching scheme if they want to have a successful NBA season next year or else they’ll end up having the same kind of season Mike D’Antoni had.

Vinny Del Negro- in my eyes he’s one of the lesser coaches. Yes, he won 50+ games with the Clippers last season but one has to ask, was he pulling the strings or was it Chris Paul? With all due respect Del Negro may be suited as an up and coming coach for a lesser team. ( Bobcats? Pistons?)

Jerry Sloan- Sloans’s offense was predicated around the Pick N Roll. He led a Deron Williams and Carlos Boozer tandem to the Western Conference Finals and the Stockton, Malone duo to the Finals by using this offense. Sloan should look at the Clippers and Nets, because they have the guards as well as the bigs who would be able to run his offense to perfection.

Doug Collins- He’s not much of a players coach (Bynum), but most his guys always give it their all…. I’m thinking Denver where he could be reunited with one of his favorite players, Igudola and lead an explosive offense that features a lot of scrappers.

Lionel Hollins- Hollins is a coach who likes to play inside out. He’s a great defensive minded coach as well. In Brooklyn he’ll have a team that has a great low post scorer as well as scrappers like he had in Memphis. Oh by the way he’ll also have alot more guard help as well.

George Karl- He’s a coach who likes to run. And that’s exactly what the Clippers do. Picture a Bledsoe-Griffin-Jordan trio running the floor like the Nuggets did. Better yet Atlanta, Smith and Teague would be awesome.

As for Brian Shaw, the Van Gundys and Phil there really isn’t a specific roster where they wouldn’t thrive. Stan likes to have floor spacers and most teams, besides the Lakers, have those. Phil and Shaw’s triangle would work anywhere. Byron Scott could help a team that features an elite PG and has good role players.

Coaches Mike Brown and Larry Drew will their respective teams grow. Brown will teach the Cavs the principle of defense. While Drew will teach his Bucks how to play a tad bit smarter and better overall.

This offseason should be very entertaining!

Is Dirk a top 5 Power Forward All Time? (Pt.2)

In my last post I left off comparing Dirk to KG and said Dirk would KG’s Boston teams better.(link to my last post http://wp.me/p33YLP-2a) With Dirk’s shooting touch and post play, ( which is a bit underrated,) Boston would be alot better than they are now and better than they were yesterday.
But anyway, on to the next player on the list, Charles Barkley.
Chuck was an undersized four that played big and could handle the rock decent enough to be a guard; or in his case a Small Forward. At 6’6, 252lbs Chuck averaged 22.1ppg, 12rebs and 4ast for his career. During the duration of his career he won an MVP award, was named an All-Star 11 times, got selected to the All-NBA First and Second Team 5x each and was on the All-Rookie First Team (1985). He also went to the Finals, where he lost to MJ, and played for the Original Dream Team. That’s all fine and dandy, but at the end of the day he’s not better than Dirk. As a 7ft pure shooter, Dirk boasts an advantage. Throw in the fact that he didn’t play with Scottie Pippen, Hakeem Olajuwon, Kevin Johnson, Julius Irving, Moses Malone, etc and you have an uneven argument. By pairing Dirk and Hakeem together you’ll have a dynamic duo that’ll be unguardable. ( Dirk had Tyson Chandler, TYSON CHANDLER as center and won the chip, c’mon now.) Pair Dirk with Doc J, Mo Cheeks and M.Malone and you’ll have a dynasty, their ages wouldn’t matter as long as Dirk was there. Last but not least, Dirk’s game isn’t based on athleticism like Charles’ was, therefore that’ll enable him play longer and still be effective like Kareem Abdul-Jabbar was. Longevity is one of the major reasons why Dirk will surpass Charles Barkley.

In front of Chuck lies Karl Malone, who is the 2nd leading scorer in NBA history. Malone has two MVP Awards, 14 All-star selections, 11 All-NBA First Team selections, two 2nd Team selections and 3 All-Defensive First Team selections and was apart of the original Dream Team. Like Chuck, Malone accomplished some things as well as lose to MJ in the Finals, but twice. For his career he averages 25ppg on 18 shots, 10rebs and 4ast.
Dirk on the other hand averages 23ppg on 17 shots, 8rebs and 3asts, while shooting a better Freethrow and 3pt % than Malone. Realistically the numbers are close, but the impact on the game isn’t.
Downlow Malone would score at will and ran the Pick and Roll to perfection with John Stockton. By doing those two things well he helped open the floor a bit for Jeff Hornacek and Bryon Russell. Having J.Sloan as the coach helped alot as well, especially when it comes to running the pick and roll. Substitute Malone for Dirk and the Jazz become better. Defensively they add a bigger and longer body, which pays dividends when defending. Offensively it’ll help help open up more things. With him stretching the floor he’ll open up lanes for Stockton to drive in as well as Hornacek. At 6’9 Malone wasn’t a joke but he also wasn’t a 7ft pure shooter that couldn’t be stopped.

Coincidentally Dirk won his first Playoff series against Karl Malone. During that series Malone averaged: 28ppg 4to 1blk 1stl 3ast 9reb and 24shots, while shooting 80% FT, 50% 3pt ( 0.2 -0.4 that doesn’t count!) and 40% from the field.
Dirk averaged: 24pts 2to 1blk 0stl 2ast 8reb and 16 shots, while shooting 90% FT 34% 3pt and 40% from the field.
Is there a clear winner? I mean give Dirk the same amount of shots and he would’ve averaged more points. But honestly this debate can go either way. Would you prefer a nice, average sized post man who is devastating on the low block, or a 7ft big who can shoot from anywhere and is just as good downlow as anyone else? The choice is yours.

Now it’s time to see how Dirk measures up the greatest PF, Tim Duncan. Duncan is a 4x Champion, 3x Finals MVP, 2x MVP, 14x All-Star, , 9x All-NBA First Team and 3x Second Team Player, 8x All-Defensive First Team and 5x All-Defensive Second Team player and a former Rookie of the Year. With him boasting all of these credentials it’s hard to put anyone over him! But when you look at the numbers you see a different story.
Career Averages: Duncan- 20ppg 11reb 3ast and 2blks
Dirk- 23ppg 8reb 3ast 1blk
As was the case in other battles no one really gains the edge.
In 26 Playoff games against each other the averages look like this:
Duncan- 26pts 3to 2blks 1stl 4ast 12reb 18 shots 53% FGP 0% 3pt 65% FT
Dirk- 25pts 2to 1blk 1stl 2ast 10reb 16 shots 50% FGP 23% 3pt 92% FT
And once again we don’t have anyone gaining an edge. But when you look at the teams you have to give it to Dirk. Dirk didn’t get coached by Gregg Pop. or play with Tony Parker, David Robinson and Manu Ginobli. Give Dirk the supporting cast Duncan has/had and Dirk’s resume would look different.
He’s Great Admit It
Throughout all of the comparisons one thing remained constant, he didn’t have as much help as them. Despite not having as much help as the others he managed to get a ring with good role players. When he had Nash and Finley on his side Nash wasn’t Phoenix Nash and Finley aged quickly therefore making them good, but not great 2nd and 3rd options. Some say he’s not a defender because he doesn’t have any awards. What they fail to realize is that he plays solid but not great defense. When you’re 7ft with long arms you’re already a decent defender.
Other things people should take note of is how Dirk changed the postions. He completely revolutionized the Forward positions. After watching him terrorize the league as a 7ft pure shooter, GMs and others started drafting players of his caliber. Dirk paved the way for guys like Kevin Durant, Chris Bosh, Pau Gasol, Ersan llyasova, Hedo Turkoglu, Peja Stojakovic, Ryan Anderson, Andrea Bargnani, Kevin Love and others who are all essentially shooting bigmen. Barkley, Duncan and Malone didn’t do that.
Dirk also led his Maverick teams to 50+ wins in 11 straight seasons. Only Duncan surpassed that. Dirk also led his team to a 67 win season, which happens to be tied for the 6th most wins ever in the Regular Season. And if that isn’t enough Dirk is only one of five players, Elgin Baylor, Hakeem Olajuwon, Bob Petit and Shaq, to average 25pts and 10rebs in the Playoffs and last but not least the only 7ft player to be in the 50’s, 40’s, 90’s club.
At the end of the day he’s the greatest European player and the 2nd best, if not the best, Power Forward to ever play the game.
image

Is Dirk Nowitzki a top 5 PF All-time? (Part 1)

         When people, fans, analysts, commentators etc, discuss the Power Forward position the conversation begins and ends with Tim Duncan, a player universally known as the Greatest PF to ever play the game. After Tim Duncan the likes of Karl Malone, Kevin Garnett, Charles Barkley and Kevin McHale get mentioned; when people try to compare Dirk Nowitzki to them most people say he’s soft and isn’t top 10. If you asked them to name 10 PFs better than him they wouldn’t be able to do it without repeating some of the names listed. Before I compare Dirk to the Elite 5, I’m going to start off from the bottom.
          Most of the young people in the world that pay attention to basketball, I’m talking kids, would say Blake Griffin, L. Aldridge and Kevin Love are better than Dirk. If we’re speaking about today then that claim may be valid, but since we’re talking about career wise they have to take a backseat to Dirk since their careers just started. But to kill this arguement even more, Dirk has led two teams to the Finals while K.Love hasn’t made it to the playoffs and L.Aldridge hasn’t been past the first round.
              Before Dirk got his ring, people speculated that Chris Bosh, David West, Pau Gasol, Rasheed Wallace, Amare’ Stoudamire, Carlos Boozer and Zach Randolph were better players. Dirk was taking a hit at the time for choking in crunch time and not being able to lead his team past the first round in most cases. What those people people failed to realize was how Dirk’s best teammate was Terry while Boozer had Deron Williams, Amare’ had Steve Nash, Gasol had Kobe, David West had CP3, Rasheed had Billups/Iverson, and Bosh, like Randolph failed to make the Playoffs in most cases.
             During that time span, 06-11, Dirk had seasons where he averaged 25pts 9reb, 24pts 9reb, 26pts 8reb, 25pts 8reb, and 23pts 7reb while none of the other players had years that were better than Dirk’s.
David West best season :  21pts 9reb
Carlos Boozer best season: 21pts 12reb
Rasheed Wallace best season: 12pts 7reb
Zach Randolph best season 21pts 13reb or 24pts 10reb
Chris Bosh best season: 24pts 11reb
Amare’ Stoudamire best season: 25pts 9reb
Pau Gasol best season: 21pts 10reb
   How many of those seasons are better than Dirk’s number wise without including FG %?
  Moving on now, if Dirk was on Rasheed Wallace’s Pistons teams they would’ve been a lot more dangerous. If Dirk would’ve been to that Hornets team instead of David West they would’ve been a lot better. If you put Dirk on that Lakers team that featured Lamar Odom, Andrew Bynum ( sad case), Kobe Bryant and Phil Jackson they would’ve 4peated. Put Dirk on Chris Bosh’s Raptors team that featured Jose Calderon they would’ve made the playoffs. Dirk and D-Will running the pick and roll would’ve equated into one of the most deadliest duos ever.( Same thing can be said for Dirk and Stockton but thats for later.) Put Dirk in Phoenix with Nash, Shawn Marion (Prime) and D’Antoni and they would’ve wrecked shop on league. Now lets flip the deal. How many of those guys could you sub in for Dirk that would led his Maverick teams that featured Jason Terry, Josh Howard and some jags ( Just A Guy,) to consecutive 50+ win seasons?
    I’ll answer that for you, none!!! Amare’ thrived doing the pick and roll with Nash; David West thrived doing the pick and roll with Chris Paul; Chris Bosh ran the pick and roll with Calderon, heck even Pau Gasol used the pick and roll to get going. In Dallas the Pick and Roll game wouldn’t have worked. In late game situations how many of those guys would’ve been able to shake loose for their shots like Dirk could? The answer is not many, if any. Throw in the fact that Dirk is the only one who’s 7ft with a stroke and an MVP award the debate gets ugly.
      Before he we can argue the Tim Duncans and KGs of the game we have to pay homage to some decent PFs that made names for themselves. Derrick Coleman, Dennis Rodman, Shawn Kemp and Chris Webber deserve some recognition. Defensively Rodman is 2nd to none, offensively he’s last to all. His offensive game was non existent and he was 6’8 which makes him a little PF. If he guarded Dirk he would get lit up for 40+.
       Now Derrick Coleman was nice, former #1 overall pick, but he only had 4 years of averaging 20+ and one allstar appearance so he’s pretty much cooked in this argument. Chris Webber doesn’t really make it an arguement either. He only had 2 years where he averaged 25pts or more. Furthermore his career was derailed by injury so we didn’t see the full extent of C-Webb. But his awards don’t really compare to Dirks either so he’s done.
        Shawn Kemp was yesterday’s Blake Griffin. His dunks were monstrous and breath taking, but every thing was OK at best. For his career he averages 14.6pts 8.4reb 1st. He tallied a total of two season in which he averaged 20 or more; his best season was when he averaged 19pts and 11reb, which really isn’t all that when compared to Dirk.
            THE TIME HAS COME

    When compared to the guys from earlier it wasn’t that fair, in the sense that he was head and shoulders above everyone else. At this stage things aren’t going be as easy, but you already knew that.
      Earlier when naming the top 5 PFs I put them in order. For those who don’t recall the sequence goes Tim Duncan-Karl Malone-Charles Barkley-Kevin Garnett-Kevin McHale. Instead of jumping the gun and going at Karl Malone or Barkley first i’ll start from the bottom.
                Dirk vs McHale
    During his time McHale was one of the best low post scorers in the game. He could defend and was an efficient player. Not to take away from his but he played with Larry Bird, arguably the best SF ever, and one the best centers ever in Robert Parish; not mention guys like Bill Walton and D.Johnson. Playing alongside them helped and hurt his career in a way. It helped because he won and accomplished some things, but it hurt because we never saw him as the main guy like we’ve seen KG, Dirk, Duncan, Barkley and Malone be. When looking at awards he has 3 rings, two 6th-man awards, 7 allstar appearances and 6 all defensive team honors. Dirk on the other hand has an MVP award, 9 allstar selections and a Finals MVP award. Throw in the fact that Dirk never played with an Allstar,( I’m not talking about an allstar that made the team as an injury replacement JOSH HOWARD,) and beat the two best players in the league, which had a top 15 player alongside them at the time, by his self shows how good Dirk really is. Give Dirk Larry Legend and the Chief and I’m sure he would have multiple championships. Dirk was also apart of the 50’s 40’s 90’s club at one point of time. Having Dirk with Parish would make that Celtics team bigger and a lot better offensively because of his floor spacing. Sorry McHale but Dirk brought another element to the table.
                 Dirk vs KG

image
This debate can go either way. Defensively Garnett has it but offensively Dirk has it. They both aren’t bangers and play in a finesse style. KG does post fades and so does Dirk. Enough of that though, it’s time for the stats.
    For his career Garnett averages 19.1pts 1.5blks 1.3stl 2.3to 4ast 10.5reb 49.8% FGP 77.6 FTP

Dirk on the other hand averages 22.7ppg 0.9blk 0.9stl 1.9to. 2.6ast 8.2reb 47.4% FGP 87%FTP
   When looking at both they’re identical so that doesn’t help as much. If you look at their best season, no one gains the advantage.
KG Best Season: 24.2ppg 1.5stl 2.2blks 5.0ast 14reb 50% FGP

Dirk Best Season: 25ppg 0.7stl 0.8blk 3.4ast 9reb 50% FGP 41% 3pt 90% FT
Maybe Post Season play will help out.
Dirk’s postseason average: 26ppg 10reb 3ast 1blk 1stl

KG’s postseason average:  20ppg 11reb 4ast 1blk 1stl.

    After viewing that Dirk gains the edge and KG doesn’t recover. Before KG went to Boston he got out of the first round once. During one of his many first exits, KG got dogged by Dirk Nowitzki.  Dirk’s team sweep KG’s with some lopsided stats.
    In the the three games they played against each other the stats looked like this:
Points Per Game:
KG- 24.0
Dirk- 33.3
Turnovers:
KG-4
Dirk-2
Blocks:
KG- 1.7
Dirk- 1.3
Steals:
KG- 1.7
Dirk- 3
Assists:
KG- 5
Dirk- 1
Rebounds:
KG- 19
Dirk- 16
Field Goal %, ( FG, 3pt, FT,) :
KG- 43% 50% 71%
Dirk- 52% 72%
Dirk pretty much wins this one because of that and because he didn’t play with Pierce, Rondo and Allen, or be coached by Doc Rivers. If KG and Rondo are a great pick and roll, pick and pop tandem picture what Dirk would do. At the end of the day Dirk has done more with less. Put Dirk on the Celtics and they’ll be a lot better because of his offensive skill set.
TBC.